Answer to Anonymous Referee
نویسندگان
چکیده
1) The title is misleading, because the presented observations are only capable to determine cloud top height of a sub-sample of clouds: those which are optically thick (cloud optical depth > 5) which correspond probably to about slightly less than half of all clouds. Especially many high-level clouds are missed, because these are mostly semi-transparent. It would have been helpful for the reader to present this fact in the beginning, with a cloud fraction for low-level, mid-level and high-level clouds.
منابع مشابه
Interactive comment on “Dryland vegetation functional response to altered rainfall amounts and variability derived from satellite time series data” by Gregor Ratzmann et al
Dedicated Responses to Anonymous Referee #3 We would like to thank Anonymous Referee #3 for providing a constructive and very helpful review of the manuscript. We believe that the comments helped improving the overall quality of the manuscript. Please find following dedicated responses to each point raised by the referee. Anonymous Referee #3 (AR #3): The analytical approach involves: 1). shift...
متن کاملInteractive comment on “Nitrate removal in a restored riparian groundwater system: functioning and importance of individual riparian zones” by S. Peter et al
Author’s response to Referees comments First, we would like to thank the two anonymous Referees for their positive and constructive reviews. Anonymous Referee #1 Referee 1: This was an easy paper to review. The study design was good and the authors provide multiple corroborating lines of data to support their conclusions. The paper is well written. I have only a few suggested changes to the tex...
متن کاملInteractive comment on “High temporal and spatial variability of dissolved oxygen and pH in a nearshore California kelp forest” by C. A. Frieder et al
Response to the review by Anonymous Referee #2 We would like to thank the anonymous referee for a thorough review and general suggestions that will improve the quality of this manuscript. In the following sections, comments originating from the reviewer will be given in italics, and text in quotations is intended to be included in manuscript revisions. Specific Comment 1 In order to constrain t...
متن کاملCompetition law, competition policy, and deregulation
Nykvist, from an anonymous referee and from the editors of this journal.
متن کاملInteractive comment on “The validity of the kinetic collection equation revisited” by L. Alfonso et al
Reply to Anonymous Referee # 1 First, we would like to thank the anonymous referees for their comments, that will improve the quality of our paper. The revised version will include several of their suggestions. General comments: a) Applications of the results to droplet collisions in clouds: Of course, we agree with the referee that simulations with monodisperse initial distributions with the p...
متن کامل